Option 1: For Primary School Teachers (Focus on Ease of Use)
| Study | Sample | Design | Key Outcomes | |-------|--------|--------|--------------| | | 12 schools, 1 850 pupils (grades 2‑5) | Controlled pre‑post (intervention vs. usual assessment) | • Average fluency growth +7 % vs. +2 % (control). • Teacher‑reported diagnostic confidence ↑ 38 %. | | OCW Nationwide Pilot (2023‑2024) | 78 schools, 12 300 pupils | Cluster‑randomised; 1‑year follow‑up | • Reading comprehension scores (CITO) improved by 0.23 SD . • Early‑warning alerts reduced “undetected at‑risk” cases from 18 % to 9 %. | | Secondary‑School Beta (2025) | 4 schools, 1 200 pupils (grades 7‑8) | Quasi‑experimental | • No statistically significant effect yet (still in early rollout). • Teachers praised visual dashboards for parent meetings. | | User‑Experience Survey (2025, n = 1 400 teachers) | 30 % of active users | Likert‑scale + open‑ended | • 86 % “easy to use”, 79 % “recommend to colleagues”. • Main pain‑point: need for offline mode in rural schools. | leesradar plantyn