Kodak Ultra F9 Vs M35 | Trusted & Latest

| Feature | Kodak Ultra F9 | Kodak M35 | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | Glass Lens | Plastic Lens | | Focal Length | 31mm | 31mm | | Aperture | f/9 (Fixed) | f/9 (Fixed) | | Focus Range | 1.0m – Infinity (Fixed Focus) | 1.0m – Infinity (Fixed Focus) | | Shutter Speed | 1/100s (Fixed) | 1/120s (Fixed) | | Flash | Built-in Electronic Flash (On/Off) | Built-in Electronic Flash (On/Off) | | Film Advance | Thumb Wheel (Manual) | Thumb Wheel (Manual) | | Rewind | Crank (Manual) | Crank (Manual) | | Power Source | 1x AAA Battery | 1x AAA Battery | | Weight/Build | Lightweight Plastic | Lightweight Plastic | | Price Point | Moderate (~$60 - $80 USD) | Low (~$40 - $50 USD) |

But which one deserves a spot in your weekend bag? We break down the differences in build, features, and image quality. kodak ultra f9 vs m35

Both cameras use the same plastic lens and the same fixed shutter mechanism. The colors, vignetting, soft edges, and light leaks are indistinguishable. Do not buy one over the other expecting sharper images. The "vintage" look is entirely dependent on your film stock (Kodak Gold 200 vs. Portra 400 vs. Lomo 800). | Feature | Kodak Ultra F9 | Kodak