Nmap License Repack -

The debate over the Nmap license continued for years, with some arguing that it was too permissive, while others claimed it was too restrictive. But Fyodor remained steadfast, convinced that the NPSL was the best way to protect Nmap and its users.

| Action | Allowed? | Requirement | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | Yes | None. | | Redistribute official copies | Yes | Keep license file and copyright notice. | | Modify source & distribute | Yes | Must rename the software; must release source under GPLv2. | | Sell Nmap | Yes | You can sell copies (e.g., on a DVD), but you must provide the source code to the buyer. | | Embed code in closed app | No | Violates GPL unless you open-source your app. | nmap license

Understanding the Nmap License: Transitioning from GPLv2 to the NPSL The debate over the Nmap license continued for

The Nmap license is stricter than GPLv2/GPLv3 in one major way: it explicitly prohibits using Nmap in a commercial SaaS scanning service without permission. The GPL does not forbid such use. This makes the Nmap license —you cannot combine Nmap code with GPL-licensed code. | Requirement | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | Yes | None