Notably, very few African journals have an IF above 2.0. The African Journal of Laboratory Medicine and African Health Sciences have IFs in the 0.8–1.5 range. Thus, PAMJ’s CiteScore of 1.7 is actually for an African medical journal, even though it lacks a formal IF.
A growing movement in scholarly communication argues that the Impact Factor is a poor proxy for research quality, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). For PAMJ, focusing on the IF could be counterproductive for several reasons: pan african medical journal impact factor
The Pan African Medical Journal has established a solid foothold in the scientific community. While specific numbers fluctuate annually based on citation activity, PAMJ generally maintains an Impact Factor in the range of mid-1.0 to high-2.0s . Notably, very few African journals have an IF above 2
However, this does not mean PAMJ lacks any metrics. The journal is well-indexed in (Elsevier’s abstract and citation database), which allows it to receive a CiteScore —Scopus’s alternative to the Impact Factor. A growing movement in scholarly communication argues that
The has established itself as a critical pillar in African scientific literature, providing a high-quality, open-access platform for health research across the continent. For researchers, clinicians, and institutions, understanding the Pan African Medical Journal impact factor is essential for gauging the journal’s growing influence and scholarly reach .